Skip to content

    Sequence of returns risk, explained plainly

    Two retirees can earn the same average return and end up in very different places. The difference is order.

    During accumulation, order does not matter much. If no money is being withdrawn, a sequence of returns and its reverse produce the same ending balance.

    Once withdrawals begin, that stops being true. Selling assets during a decline permanently removes shares that would otherwise have participated in the recovery. The same average return, experienced in a different order, produces a materially different outcome.

    This is why the years immediately before and after retirement carry disproportionate weight. It is a concentrated risk period, not a permanent condition.

    Common responses, with their tradeoffs

    • Holding a cash or short term reserve to fund spending during a decline. Costs growth, buys optionality.
    • Covering essential spending with contractual income sources. Costs liquidity and flexibility, provides a floor.
    • Reducing withdrawals temporarily in poor years. Costs lifestyle flexibility, preserves capital.
    • Adjusting allocation approaching the risk window. Costs long term growth potential, reduces volatility exposure.
    • Order of returns matters only once withdrawals start.
    • The risk concentrates around the transition into retirement.
    • Every mitigation has a cost. The right one depends on the household.

    This content is general education, not legal, tax or investment advice, and not a recommendation of any specific product. Suitability depends on individual facts, product terms, issuing company strength and current law. Consult your own licensed legal and tax professionals before acting.

    Last reviewed 2026-08-09 by Tim Parnell.